🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 581+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(581 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

It complete works! Tested all functions! Cool cute little radio!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player

It every works! Tested all functions! Cool cute little radio!

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2499896

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Radios

Original Price: $75 USD

Sale Price: $45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2228 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
The Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player performs nicely.
2 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
flawless Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player
Quality is not bad.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
highly satisfied buyer. Good Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player.
9 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly propose!
Not the ultimate, not the worst. Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player is okay.
25 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
After assorted use, the Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player works well enough and it’s fine overall.
21 people found this helpful