🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 930+ reviews
Women ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Roll-up hem wide denim pants

★★★★★4.1 out of 5(930 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30.79
$51.32
Sale
✓ complimentary delivery on this item • Limited time offer

I am selling this item because the size didn't fit.It is in charming condition (ᴗ͈ˬᴗ͈)‪‪

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Roll-up hem wide denim pants

I am selling this item because the size didn't fit.
It is in stunning condition (ᴗ͈ˬᴗ͈)‪‪

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2271949

Category: Women > Jeans > Straight Leg

Original Price: $51.32 USD

Sale Price: $30.79 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.1
★★★★★
Based on 1711 reviews
AC
Amber Carter ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Baltimore, MD
★★★★★
fantastic find!​
From my experience, the Roll-up hem wide denim pants performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Works fine so far.
50 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Orlando, FL
★★★★☆
outstanding in every way
Honestly, the Roll-up hem wide denim pants works fine which is good enough.
14 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Fresno, CA
★★★★★
terrific Roll-up hem wide denim pants!
Good build quality on this Roll-up hem wide denim pants.
2 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Las Vegas, NV

★★★★★
top purchase ever
Nice value product Roll-up hem wide denim pants.
27 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Detroit, MI
★★★★★
Highly satisfied
Personally, the Roll-up hem wide denim pants works well enough so no complaints. Packaging was plain.
19 people found this helpful