🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 740+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(740 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20.4
$34
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone.It's missing one of the bases.Comes with the original box and instructions.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone

vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone.
It's missing one of the bases.


Comes with the original box and instructions.​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1795691

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Telephones

Original Price: $34 USD

Sale Price:$20.4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5562 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
Honestly, it works fine and it meets expectations.
49 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill
9 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
No complaints at this price.
41 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
From my experience, it is effortless to use and it’s fine overall.
17 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
3 weeks ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality
From my experience, the vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone is practical and I’m satisfied.
2 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
So far, the vtech cs6829-2 cordless phone feels solid and it works for me.
29 people found this helpful